All Humboldt
← Back to News
Government Trinidad

Trinidad Planners Debate 'Unwanted Sound' in Coastal Plan Update

The Trinidad Planning Commission dedicated its September meeting to reviewing the city's Local Coastal Plan Noise Element, sparking a debate on how to define noise pollution versus natural ambient sounds. Citing a lack of specific data, the commission tabled any formal decisions, tasking staff with revising the document for future review.

TRINIDAD, CA – The definition of noise itself became the central topic at the Trinidad Planning Commission’s meeting on Wednesday, September 17, as commissioners undertook a detailed review of the Noise Element of the city's Local Coastal Plan (LCP).

The discussion, which dominated the 58-minute hybrid meeting, focused on whether the current definition of noise as simply "unwanted sound" is sufficient for a coastal community where the sounds of ocean waves and wind are a constant presence. Commissioners expressed concern about differentiating between this natural, ambient soundscape and genuine noise pollution from sources like traffic or construction.

During the review, several commissioners highlighted that the existing document lacked specific data on current noise levels and sources within Trinidad. This lack of information, they argued, makes it difficult to create effective and enforceable policies. The need for a more comprehensive approach that categorizes different types of noise and establishes clear thresholds was a recurring theme.

"The current categorization of noise sources, primarily divided between stationary and transportation, may not be comprehensive enough," one commissioner noted, reflecting the group's desire for a more nuanced document that could better inform future planning decisions.

The LCP's Noise Element is a critical component of the city's master planning document, influencing regulations on everything from construction hours and special event permits to new development standards. A well-defined policy aims to protect the quality of life for residents while balancing the needs of a vibrant community.

No formal action was taken on the Noise Element. The commission ultimately agreed to continue the discussion at a future date after city staff have had an opportunity to revise the draft and incorporate more detailed information.

In other business, with four of the five members present, the commission unanimously approved the evening's agenda but voted to table the approval of meeting minutes from June 18 and August 20 until its next session.

← Back to All Articles